The service desk incurs high costs when it runs on legacy systems or paper-based manual exercises a familiar norm for traditional service desks. Due to the lack of service desk automation, the cost per ticket ranges between $75 and $600 when escalated to the higher tiers. But that’s only the surface-level view of the hidden costs of manual ticket resolutions. It has many sides, which can be more painful and strain your bottom line.
Legacy infrastructure and operational inefficiencies
Most service desk tools follow a legacy approach. This means they consist of cumbersome user interfaces for service desk agents, requiring them to toggle between several tabs and modules to handle and resolve a query. Your agents spend a lot of time getting context and coming to a conclusion. Due to the inefficient agent interfaces, legacy tools lead to poor experience and operational inefficiencies, increasing the volume of tickets and costs.
Lack of standardized processes for ticket escalation
Traditional service desks work in silo. The legacy system forces employees to use emails, embedded chats, social messaging, and telephony or voice calls. These provide a disjointed experience for agents, leaving them confused and frustrated as they look for what they need to connect with employees and solve problems. There are often high infrastructure costs for these additional tools, while longer wait times cost you lost productivity.
Employee training and development
With traditional service desks comes the inevitable need to provide employee training and development. This is quite a bottom-line strain for you. Since legacy systems contain fragmented fields or modules to convey various types of employee queries, both employees and agents need steep learning curves to work with multiple systems.
High operating costs
The traditional service desk incurs high operating costs for various communication systems to create tickets manually. Apart from TCO for the legacy infrastructure, tools such as emails, chats, social messaging, and telephony systems add to high infrastructure costs. Also, the shortages of L1 support, including high-level support agents, need additional costs for refilling and allocating resources for extra hours.
Increased response time
A familiar scene in traditional service desks with legacy systems is that manual exercises are highly prevailing. Since automation has little to offer help, agents heavily depend on a paper-based approach, mostly Excel Sheets, to track tickets and incidents. Agents need more context of previous history due to missing references or manual errors. So, when a new case comes up, manual triage takes time for analysis exercise, which increases MTTR. Longer wait times translate into a backlog of tickets and high costs.
Reactive support
Paper-based exercises across the traditional service desks leave fewer scopes to improve service desk performance. Due to the manual process, many critical data points might fall through the cracks, giving little insight into performance monitoring and future needs. This approach turns traditional service desks into a break/fix model or reactive support, which only tends to fix the problem as it arrives. Unfortunately, the tenacity leads to reassignments of tickets and costs your users—both employees and service desk agents tangible productivity hours of 109 minutes. Don’t bypass the expedited cost per ticket for this reason.
Compliance issues with ITSM
To a great extent, manual interventions delay the service desk’s response in addressing employee problems. Unfortunately, delayed responses hinder you from providing support in tandem with the standards as per ITIL for ITSM. As a result, you tend to violate service level agreements or SLAs, which impact user experience.
Scalability issues
As you grow, your traditional service desk experience will become more painful. The manual approach takes more time to solve each ticket, leading to a backlog of tickets for service desk agents. Agents undoubtedly need extra hours to spend on tickets outside their working hours, raising the cost per ticket.
As you can see, manual ticket resolution in employee support involves high costs, even though the legacy vendors claim cost savings on TCO. However, the trade-offs clearly indicate why IT directors must work with modernized IT ticket resolutions built with GenAI and automation.